From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5539 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 13:02:53 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 13:02:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 5636 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2001 13:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 16152 Received: (qmail 5606 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 13:02:41 -0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: About MODDIR (again...) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 14:45:52 +0200 From: Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado Reply-To: Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado Sender: Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado X-Mailer: DervishD TWiSTiNG Mailer Hello all :)) I've downloaded and tested zsh 4.0.3, and I have the same suggestion: is really needed to install modules onto /usr/lib/zsh/4.0.3/zsh/? For me it has no sense: /usr/lib/zsh is empty except for directory '4.0.3'. But this directory is empty too. It only contains 'zsh', which contains the modules. Is necessary such a long hierarchy just for keeping the modules. At least the last 'zsh' is not needed (IMHO), and the version number should be made optional for systems with just one version of zsh installed. For removing the last 'zsh' only a few makefiles need to be edited, and for the rest... Well, if MODDIR could be chosen thru the 'configure' script, all this matter will vanish. Why is it hardcoded? I don't know :? Will I really break something if I replace MODDIR by hand? Please let me know... Please excuse me asking again the same, but I really don't like not having control over where my packages deploy its files ;)))) And thanks again for a new version of Zsh. You're great :))) Raúl