Re: [PATCH] complete two or more options for zsh

["Jun T." <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>]

On 2015/10/01, at 1:19, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:

> Probably the ideal way to complete script args is to use "compset -n"
> to simulate the script name appearing in command position, and then
> call _normal.


Before sending the previous patch I tried

*::script argumets:_normal

and the following worked (IF script had its own compdef):

% zsh script <TAB>    # or -<TAB>

But then I thought there would be not much chance that the user had
defined compdef for the script; otherwise it would just complete files.
(Or are there any difference even if there is no compdef for the script?)
And it caused 'zsh -s <TAB>' to complete executables instead of arguments.
So I thought it would just be enough to call _files.

But, yes, maybe calling _normal would be useful for some users.
How about the following? (includes my previous patch)


diff --git a/Completion/Unix/Command/_zsh b/Completion/Unix/Command/_zsh
index 3b6d7ad..a541467 100644
--- a/Completion/Unix/Command/_zsh
+++ b/Completion/Unix/Command/_zsh
@@ -1,8 +1,23 @@
 #compdef zsh
 
+local curcontext=$curcontext state state_descr line expl
+typeset -A opt_args
+
 _arguments -S -s : \
   '*-o+[set named option]:option:_options' \
   '*+o+[unset named option]:option:_options' \
+  '(1 -s --shinstdin)'{-s,--shinstdin}'[read commands from standard input]' \
+  '(-)-b[end of option processing, like --]' \
   '(1 -)-c[run a command]:command:_cmdstring' \
   '(-)1:script file:_files' \
-  '*:command arguments' --
+  '*::script arguments:->args' -- && return 0
+
+case $state in
+  (args)
+    if [[ -n ${opt_args[(I)-c|-s|--shinstdin]} ]]; then
+      _files
+    else
+      _normal
+    fi
+    ;;
+esac