From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12852 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2000 07:34:50 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Feb 2000 07:34:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 17992 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2000 07:34:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9593 Received: (qmail 17985 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2000 07:34:42 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) From: "Andrej Borsenkow" To: "Bart Schaefer" , "Zsh hackers list" Subject: RE: Makefile target given more than once (Re: 3.1.6-dev-17) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:34:38 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-To: <1000206191509.ZM11249@candle.brasslantern.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 > } > } gmake[1]: Entering directory `/tools/src/zsh-3.1.6-dev-17/Doc' > } Makefile:217: target `zsh.texi' given more than once in the same rule. > > Hrm. This would appear to be gmake cleverly discovering that when $(sdir) > is ".", zsh.texi and $(sdir)/zsh.texi are the same target. > > Does that actually cause the build to fail, or is it just noise? > So far it is just noise. But why we need two targets? One is obviously redundant. > Can we count on other "make" implementations being that clever? I didn't > think so, but ... > I stopped trying native make long ago. I'm even not sure, that it is possible at all with current makefiles. /andrej