From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9964 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2000 16:31:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Jul 2000 16:31:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 6990 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2000 16:30:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 12426 Received: (qmail 6975 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2000 16:30:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:30:28 +0300 (EEST) From: Juhapekka Tolvanen To: Bart Schaefer cc: Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: Bug or feature? In-Reply-To: <1000728160935.ZM9400@candle.brasslantern.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Jul 28, 1:40pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: > } > } > > ii zsh 3.1.6.pws21-1 A shell with lots of features. > } > > } > That's pretty old. Could you install at least 3.1.9? In any case, I > } > presume it was a bug, since it works in current version. > } > } I don't know if it's that simple, but I don't know if it isn't either. > } We've got an old 3.1.6-dev-19 here and it works there, too. But there was > } no such version as 3.1.6.pws21 since I'd switched to using dev by then. > We could find out for sure if Juhapekka would run `echo $ZSH_VERSION'. The > Debian package number is only of interest in figuring out if they made a > change that broke something. juhtolv@heresy : /home/juhtolv % echo $ZSH_VERSION 7717 | pts/5 3.1.6-dev-21 juhtolv@heresy : /home/juhtolv % zsh --version 7718 | pts/5 juhtolv@heresy : /home/juhtolv % 7713 | pts/5 Whatta fsck??? Grrrr..... http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/user/guckes/version/ > On Jul 28, 3:51pm, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > } Well, Potato is frozen state right now and it will go to stable state very > } soon. No single package in stable Debian distribution is allowed to have so > } called release critical bugs. And that means, that zsh provided with Potato > } has no release critical bugs. > It means no package in Potato has a release-critical bug that the Debian > team knows about. Not quite the same thing. I don't think, they will consider that bug "release critical". AFAIK "critical" and "grave" bugs are considered "release critical bugs". If I will send a bug report and put "grave" to Severity:-field, I think I'll be flamed by that Debian developer, that maintains Debian package of zsh. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities critical makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break, or causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hole on systems where you install the package. grave makes the package in question unuseable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use the package. important any other bug which makes the package unsuitable for release. normal the default value, for normal bugs. wishlist for any feature request, and also for any bugs that are very difficult to fix due to major design considerations. fixed for bugs that are fixed but should not yet be closed. Bugs fixed by non-maintainer-uploads have their severity set to fixed. -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * U of Jyväskylä * juhtolv@st.jyu.fi http://www.cc.jyu.fi/~juhtolv/ * * "STRAIGHT BUT NOT NARROW !!" --------------------------------------------------------------- "if i was twice the man i could be, i'd still be half of what you need" Nine Inch Nails