From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-17084-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 12168 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 19:02:15 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 May 2002 19:02:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 6408 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 19:02:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 17084
Received: (qmail 6385 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 19:01:57 -0000
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Sender: schaefer@ns1.sodaware.com
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com>
cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: PATCH: zselect builtin. 
In-Reply-To: <26209.1020790864@csr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205071157450.22884-100000@ns1.sodaware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 7 May 2002, Peter Stephenson wrote:

> Well, the convention with other bits and pieces is just to stick a `z'
> in front to keep the namespace reasonably unpolluted.  Maybe zselectfd
> would be OK?

Nah, if you're going to stick the `z' on there anyway, there's no reason
to append `fd'.