From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-20129-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 10562 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2004 21:35:52 -0000
Received: from odin.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.85)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 21:35:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 15987 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2004 22:48:35 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 22:48:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 13687 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2004 21:35:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 20129
Received: (qmail 13677 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2004 21:35:39 -0000
Received: from odin.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (qmailr@130.225.247.85)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 21:35:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 15770 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2004 22:48:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO moonbase.zanshin.com) (@167.160.213.139)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 22:48:16 -0000
Received: from toltec.zanshin.com (toltec.zanshin.com [64.84.47.166])
	by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i62LZOlf014120
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:35:24 -0700
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Reply-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Musing about zselect
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407021432400.22788@toltec.zanshin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Hits: 0.0

The recent discussion on zsh-users about colorizing stderr has led me to 
wonder why zselect wasn't called sysselect and added to the zsh/system
module.

Is it only because sysread and syswrite are available on a wider range
of platforms?