From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18615 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2004 02:01:43 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Aug 2004 02:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 71219 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2004 01:54:07 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 22 Aug 2004 01:54:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 16956 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2004 01:53:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 20278 Received: (qmail 16944 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2004 01:53:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by 130.225.247.90 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2004 01:53:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 70983 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2004 01:51:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO moonbase.zanshin.com) (167.160.213.139) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 22 Aug 2004 01:49:13 -0000 Received: from toltec.zanshin.com (toltec.zanshin.com [64.84.47.166]) by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7M1lMu9014415 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:47:23 -0700 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:47:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Reply-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Bug#262247: zsh: Improved make completion In-Reply-To: <20040821180920.GA24266@blorf.net> Message-ID: References: <20040730101751.GA11905@larve.net> <20040730153054.GA4059@scowler.net> <20040730165133.GL12279@larve.net> <20040818150736.GI4753@larve.net> <20040821180920.GA24266@blorf.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: Content-Disposition: INLINE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: -0.0 [Dropped bugs.debian.org] On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, Wayne Davison wrote: > Also, feel free to suggest how to improve it (for instance, I'd like to > know if the eval statements can be replaced with something else). Let's see ... eval val=\${$var} ... I believe that's ... val=${(P)var} ... and ... eval $var=\$val ... can be ... : ${(P)var::=$val} ... but I'm not sure that last is any better than the eval.