zsh-workers
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: zsh exits after delete-char-or-list and two ^Cs
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:59:49 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409030827210.28049@toltec.zanshin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409030937.i839bJxR018972@news01.csr.com>

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Peter Stephenson wrote:

> (Oliver says the In-reply-to and References format should work better
> like this.  Tell me if it doesn't.)

(Looks fine.  What are you using as a mail reader?)

> Bart Schaefer wrote:
> >   zle && echo "widgets callable"	# I'm least certain of this
> >   zle -I && echo "Display invalidated and widgets callable"
> >   zle -R && echo "Display refreshed and zle active"
> > 
> > Is that right?
> 
> Yes, noting that testing for `display invalidated' and `display
> refreshed' doesn't form part of the return status (I think that's what
> you mean but it's not clear from the output).

Hmm.  OK, that's not so good, because it breaks "zle -I || ..." in the 
case where you want to know whether the display was NOT invalidated.
(Maybe there's never a reason to care about that, but ...)

> I agree, it's just a question of how much of a stickler you are for
> having the return status reflecting `command did what I expected' rather
> than `command did something and tested for something else'.

I'm quite willing to have "zle -I" go back to testing for "invalidating
the display was a sensible thing to attempt" provided that "zle" (no args)
tests for "widgets callable", and that all of this is documented more
clearly.

> I want to emphasis calling zle -I multiple times has no bad effect.  
> Maybe the English for that is "calling zle -I multiple times has no bad 
> effects".

Yeah.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-03 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-25 17:04 Danek Duvall
2004-08-27  0:22 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-01 18:10   ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-01 19:44     ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-02  9:19       ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-02 15:15         ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-03  9:37           ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-03 18:59             ` Bart Schaefer [this message]
2004-09-07 14:08               ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-08 14:23               ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-01 17:36 ` Peter Stephenson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0409030827210.28049@toltec.zanshin.com \
    --to=schaefer@brasslantern.com \
    --cc=zsh-workers@sunsite.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).