From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12214 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 07:37:48 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 07:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 36757 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 07:37:41 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 07:37:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 14076 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2004 07:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 20329 Received: (qmail 14062 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 07:37:27 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 07:37:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 36459 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 07:37:27 -0000 Received: from moonbase.zanshin.com (64.84.47.139) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 07:37:26 -0000 Received: from toltec.zanshin.com (toltec.zanshin.com [64.84.47.166]) by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i887bNmw005410 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:37:23 -0700 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:37:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Reply-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Any comments on users/7883 ? In-Reply-To: <200409071025.i87AP2BB002043@news01.csr.com> Message-ID: References: <20040906124533.58856.qmail@web25002.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <200409061315.i86DFvFC028391@news01.csr.com> <200409071025.i87AP2BB002043@news01.csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: -0.0 On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Peter Stephenson wrote: > This may be the best we're going to get. OK, I'm going to add something to E01options and then commit it. > Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > (Is it just me, or is there a crash waiting to happen at line 1828 in the > > event of a badly written module?) > > You mean before the patch? Yes, I did mean before.