From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19167 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2004 21:55:18 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 21:55:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 75345 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2004 21:55:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 21:55:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 7078 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2004 21:55:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 20370 Received: (qmail 7049 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2004 21:55:00 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 21:55:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 75064 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2004 21:55:00 -0000 Received: from moonbase.zanshin.com (64.84.47.139) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 13 Sep 2004 21:54:57 -0000 Received: from toltec.zanshin.com (toltec.zanshin.com [64.84.47.166]) by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8DLsuF0027987 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:54:56 -0700 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 14:54:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Bart Schaefer Reply-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Anyone noitce problem with SHLVL in 4.2.1 ? In-Reply-To: <16709.55554.784988.736035@cns-build4.cisco.com> Message-ID: References: <16709.55554.784988.736035@cns-build4.cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: -0.0 On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Paul Lew wrote: > Bug or feature? Thanks in advance. I can reproduce this, and it's almost certainly not intentional. I suspect zsh-workers/20141, but only because it's the only thing that has touched PM_SPECIAL paramters as far as I can tell from the ChangeLog.