From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: PATCH: exit after 10 EOF's
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:25:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409191220000.6971@toltec.zanshin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409191119580.6971@toltec.zanshin.com>
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> I haven't gotten to the latter part yet, but here's a patch that (a) backs
> out 20363 and (b) causes the count to apply to printing of the warning.
Actually I just noticed that it doesn't _completely_ back out 20363. This
part of 20363 is still there:
bindk = getkeycmd();
- if (!ll && isfirstln && !(zlereadflags & ZLRF_IGNOREEOF) &&
- lastchar == eofchar) {
- eofsent = 1;
- break;
- }
if (bindk) {
- if (execzlefunc(bindk, zlenoargs))
+ if (!ll && isfirstln && !(zlereadflags & ZLRF_IGNOREEOF) &&
+ lastchar == eofchar) {
+ /*
+ * Slight hack: this relies on getkeycmd returning
+ * a value for the EOF character. However,
+ * undefined-key is fine. That's necessary because
+ * otherwise we can't distinguish this case from
+ * a ^C.
+ */
+ eofsent = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (execzlefunc(bindk, zlenoargs)) {
However, I can't figure out when getkeycmd() might fail to return a value
for the EOF character, so I can't decide whether this makes a difference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-19 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-13 11:18 Peter Stephenson
2004-09-13 17:51 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-15 9:46 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-15 15:43 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-15 16:02 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-15 16:14 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-16 14:57 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-16 16:12 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-16 16:28 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-19 6:50 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-19 7:45 ` Duncan Sinclair
2004-09-19 16:41 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-19 17:52 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-19 18:26 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-19 19:25 ` Bart Schaefer [this message]
2004-09-20 10:15 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-20 13:59 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-20 14:43 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-20 14:53 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-19 19:11 ` Bart Schaefer
2004-09-19 11:53 ` Peter Stephenson
2004-09-19 17:00 ` Bart Schaefer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0409191220000.6971@toltec.zanshin.com \
--to=schaefer@brasslantern.com \
--cc=zsh-workers@sunsite.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).