From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17687 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 15:34:53 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 15:34:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 96377 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 15:34:47 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 15:34:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 8266 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 15:34:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 20569 Received: (qmail 8250 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 15:34:31 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 15:34:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 96058 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 15:34:31 -0000 Received: from moonbase.zanshin.com (64.84.47.139) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 15:34:30 -0000 Received: from toltec.zanshin.com (toltec.zanshin.com [64.84.47.166]) by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAJFYSwn018529 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:34:28 -0800 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:34:28 -0800 (PST) From: Bart Schaefer Reply-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: SUGGESTION: kill -l could show numbers, too (+CLD vs CHLD) In-Reply-To: <27996.1100858392@csr.com> Message-ID: References: <20041118145208.GD13232@gerf.org> <20310.1100793917@csr.com> <20041118163901.GD4511@sc> <6451.1100798576@csr.com> <27996.1100858392@csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Hits: -0.0 On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Peter Stephenson wrote: > made it prefer SIGPOLL to SIGIO. If they don't have the same signal number, they still both appear, right? > the real killer is function-style traps. No pun intended.