From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-20642-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 12471 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 15:59:01 -0000
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 15:59:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 84346 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 15:58:54 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 15:58:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 22392 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2005 15:58:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 20642
Received: (qmail 22375 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 15:58:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 15:58:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 83540 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 15:57:39 -0000
Received: from moonbase.zanshin.com (64.84.47.139)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 15:57:36 -0000
Received: from toltec.zanshin.com (toltec.zanshin.com [64.84.47.166])
	by moonbase.zanshin.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j03FvXBJ009411
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:57:33 -0800
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:57:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Reply-To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk
Subject: Re: Zsh killed when autoloaded function calls mislinked program 
In-Reply-To: <200412211130.iBLBUV9D011813@news01.csr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501030742340.32450@toltec.zanshin.com>
References: <20041220202059.GE11940@alan.cs.pdx.edu> <200412211130.iBLBUV9D011813@news01.csr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 on a.mx.sunsite.dk
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Hits: 0.0

[I'm back from holiday travel.]

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Peter Stephenson wrote:

> -		killjb(jn, lastval & ~0200);
> +		if (jn->gleader)
> +		    killjb(jn, lastval & ~0200);


This looks right to me, but I haven't groveled through that code for a 
while.  The only case where it might be wrong is in a subshell if the 
subshell is to die with the same signal as the job, but I *think* that's
handled elsewhere by the value passed to exit() ... and AFAICT from some
attempts at testing, it is.