From: Andrej Borsenkow <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
To: <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Cc: Paul Ackersviller <paulda@alumni.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: 64-bit sparc instructions
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:38:23 +0400 (MSD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.4.33.0105231332520.3756-100000@itsrm2.mow.siemens.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1010523044128.ZM23100@candle.brasslantern.com>
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On May 22, 8:04pm, Paul Ackersviller wrote:
> }
> } [...] What does make a difference is simply generating default 32-bit
> } sparc instructions. I'd negelected to mention that I was using Sun's
> } compiler and 64-bit code. I suppose it's fair to blame this one on Sun.
>
> Is that problem solved by the following?
>
> On May 22, 2:32pm, Clint Adams wrote:
> } Subject: Re: 4.0.1-pre-5 (solaris issues)
> }
> } > the 64-bit Forte compiler. Can you figure out what we need to be passing
> } > as a compiler argument that we aren't, or whatever?
> }
> } LFS64_CFLAGS: -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
> } LFS_CFLAGS: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> }
> } By replacing the latter with the former, the test [succeeds].
>
> If so, can you identify a configure test we can use to decide when to
> use LFS64_CFLAGS instead of LFS_CFLAGS ? (The existing test is in the
> definition of zsh_LARGE_FILE_SUPPORT in aczsh.m4.)
>
>
Hmm ... they both have very different semantic. LFS means, use existing
interfaces but assume some parameters are 64 bit (off_t, size_t, ino_t to
name some).
LFS64 means - you are explicitly using special 64-bit version of these
interfaces (open64 vs. open, stat64 vs. stat etc) that are using special
types (off64_t, ino64_t etc). Zsh is not designed to do it.
So, if the above change really helped, it was just because zsh was
actually compiled in 32-bit mode :-) We simply need better detection if
LFS really works. Could you provide testcase suitable for putting in
configure?
-andrej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-23 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-23 3:04 vi editting troubles Paul Ackersviller
2001-05-23 4:41 ` 64-bit sparc instructions Bart Schaefer
2001-05-23 9:38 ` Andrej Borsenkow [this message]
2001-05-23 16:42 ` Clint Adams
2001-05-23 12:29 ` Clint Adams
2001-05-23 6:28 ` vi editting troubles Bart Schaefer
2001-05-23 7:08 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2001-05-23 9:42 ` Peter Stephenson
2001-05-23 18:18 ` Wayne Davison
2001-05-23 19:31 ` Bart Schaefer
2001-05-29 6:59 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2001-05-29 11:57 ` PATCH: " Sven Wischnowsky
2001-05-29 14:58 ` Bart Schaefer
2001-05-30 7:19 ` Sven Wischnowsky
2001-05-24 2:24 64-bit sparc instructions nce
2001-05-24 4:49 ` Clint Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SV4.4.33.0105231332520.3756-100000@itsrm2.mow.siemens.ru \
--to=andrej.borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru \
--cc=paulda@alumni.uwo.ca \
--cc=zsh-workers@sunsite.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).