From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18930 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2001 04:33:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 23 Jul 2001 04:33:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 16548 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2001 04:32:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 15455 Received: (qmail 16537 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2001 04:32:56 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:32:53 +0400 (MSD) From: Andrej Borsenkow X-X-Sender: To: Fletch cc: Andrej Borsenkow , Subject: Re: Where to add extra libraries for modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On 22 Jul 2001, Fletch wrote: > > > I'm fairly sure that perl defaults to building a static > libperl.a unless you tell it otherwise. And if it does, I'm pretty > sure that it adds the apropriate -R... flags to set the ld.so search > path. > Yes, I know. You miss my point. First, I have no idea if these flags have any effect when building *shared object* as opposed to building *executable*. Second, we may already have something in LD_RUN_PATH that needs to be combined with Perl. That cannot be done inside a Makefile and needs external linker script (libtool? :-) Third, why do you think it is -R flag? You are speaking about Linux that is porgrammers paradise - everything works as it should. Other systems may not be as user friendly. -andrej