From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 888 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2001 16:20:58 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Mar 2001 16:20:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 29352 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2001 16:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 13822 Received: (qmail 29339 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2001 16:20:51 -0000 Message-ID: To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Moving completion functions In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:14:01 -0000." <1010328161401.ZM16238@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:20:26 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Bart wrote: > } And a better name for `_wanted' might be `_offer', but that doesn't > } make it easier to find in a directory listing, of course. Although it > } would end up just before `_requested' and there are only twelve > } functions in the directory anyway. > > That one is a toss-up. I don't know whether _offer is better than _wanted. > The number of functions in the directory isn't an issue. In that case, better leave it, in case anyone's being looking at the user guide, which makes quite heavy use of _wanted. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR Ltd., Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070