From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9569 invoked from network); 30 May 2001 10:26:19 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 May 2001 10:26:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 26935 invoked by alias); 30 May 2001 10:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14565 Received: (qmail 26924 invoked from network); 30 May 2001 10:26:12 -0000 Message-ID: To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Proposed announcement for 4.0.1 In-reply-to: "Oliver Kiddle"'s message of "Wed, 30 May 2001 10:58:22 BST." <3B14C43E.5C44BD36@u.genie.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:20:42 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Oliver Kiddle wrote: > Good. I think it might be a good idea if all the 3.0.8 patches from > sourceforge are put together and released as 3.0.8a or 3.0.9 or > something. 3.0 is still sometimes useful and I think it would be handy > to have a final definitive release of 3.0 to refer to. That's up to Bart if he feels like doing it. > > Someone better remind me to move the > > contents of ChangeLog-Release and ChangeLog to Changelog-4.0 and create a > > The `Version' section of the README file also needs updating. Also, I've noticed some tweaks in INSTALL after Andrej mentioned it, for example I think it would help the impatient if the list of features right at the end showed default settings. I'll try and look at this. > There's quite a few problems on IRIX 5.3 which is now very old anyway so > I'll just update it out of Etc/MACHINES. It might be wise to remove some > of the other old entries from it too where we haven't had a positive > report in a long time (i.e. Cray, Data General, Next, Sco, Siemens). I suggest making a list of these at the end, with a note saying it may build on them but we haven't had reports, and if anyone does have a report would they please send it. > I've removed the architectures next to the Linux entry because after > adding sparc, alpha, AMD Athlon, ia64 etc the list would be getting > silly. Fine, it might be an idea to mention it's expected to work on both 32-bit and 64-bit processors. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR Ltd., Unit 300, Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0XL, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 392070 ********************************************************************** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. **********************************************************************