* FreeBSD completion patch (related to mount)
@ 2008-10-28 23:29 Sean C. Farley
2008-10-29 1:40 ` Clint Adams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sean C. Farley @ 2008-10-28 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zsh-workers
Here are a couple of patches to completion on FreeBSD concerning mount.
The reason I kept msdos options on FreeBSD as well as the msdosfs
options is that FreeBSD's mount will accept mount -t msdos with a
warning that msdosfs is the proper name.
http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/_file_systems.patch
http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/_mount.patch
Sean
P.S. Please Cc: me as I am not on this list.
--
scf@FreeBSD.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: FreeBSD completion patch (related to mount)
2008-10-28 23:29 FreeBSD completion patch (related to mount) Sean C. Farley
@ 2008-10-29 1:40 ` Clint Adams
2008-10-29 23:53 ` Richard Hartmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Clint Adams @ 2008-10-29 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean C. Farley; +Cc: zsh-workers
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 06:29:35PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> Here are a couple of patches to completion on FreeBSD concerning mount.
> The reason I kept msdos options on FreeBSD as well as the msdosfs
> options is that FreeBSD's mount will accept mount -t msdos with a
> warning that msdosfs is the proper name.
It seems less useful to offer that option then, no?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: FreeBSD completion patch (related to mount)
2008-10-29 1:40 ` Clint Adams
@ 2008-10-29 23:53 ` Richard Hartmann
2008-10-30 1:03 ` Sean C. Farley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Hartmann @ 2008-10-29 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean C. Farley, zsh-workers
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:40, Clint Adams <clint@zsh.org> wrote:
> It seems less useful to offer that option then, no?
Esp since the correct option is the prefix of the wrong one.
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: FreeBSD completion patch (related to mount)
2008-10-29 23:53 ` Richard Hartmann
@ 2008-10-30 1:03 ` Sean C. Farley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sean C. Farley @ 2008-10-30 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Hartmann; +Cc: zsh-workers
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 02:40, Clint Adams <clint@zsh.org> wrote:
>
>> It seems less useful to offer that option then, no?
I tried to write the patches to offer msdosfs and not msdos as an option
to -t. Since msdos is still accepted, I wrote the patch to display the
msdosfs options for both when -o is completed. DragonFlyBSD is
basically the same except for the "fs" suffixes on three of the file
systems offered according to its man pages.
> Esp since the correct option is the prefix of the wrong one.
It appears to work correctly for me. Did I miss something?
Examples:
1. mount -t <Tab> shows msdosfs and not msdos.
2. mount -t (msdos|msdosfs) -o <Tab> show the exact same options.
Sean
--
scf@FreeBSD.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-30 1:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-28 23:29 FreeBSD completion patch (related to mount) Sean C. Farley
2008-10-29 1:40 ` Clint Adams
2008-10-29 23:53 ` Richard Hartmann
2008-10-30 1:03 ` Sean C. Farley
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).