From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21649 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2010 14:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27861 Received: (qmail 5615 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 14:49:47 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at benizi.com designates 64.130.10.15 as permitted sender) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:39:50 -0400 (EDT) From: "Benjamin R. Haskell" To: "Alexey I. Froloff" cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: _redirect and _x_arguments completion issue In-Reply-To: <20100407134009.GB29592@altlinux.org> Message-ID: References: <20100407134009.GB29592@altlinux.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Alexey I. Froloff wrote: > $ > > Nothing! See: zsh-workers 27589 http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2010/msg00041.html Peter: your followup said you weren't ignoring it... did that ever make it in? > Isn't _x_arguments dead since XOrg? Maybe? Though, I think it depends on your distribution whether things are installed into an X11/ subdirectory. -- Best, Ben