From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28918-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 25843 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2011 02:56:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28918
Received: (qmail 18358 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2011 02:56:10 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at benizi.com designates 64.130.10.15 as permitted sender)
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Benjamin R. Haskell" <zsh@benizi.com>
To: Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>
cc: Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se>, zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Fix git-branch -[dD] -r completion
In-Reply-To: <87y64cgj4r.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1103182244390.22141@hp>
References: <1300484112-9392-1-git-send-email-now@bitwi.se> <1300484112-9392-4-git-send-email-now@bitwi.se> <87y64cgj4r.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Frank Terbeck wrote:

> Hm, with this patch, this:
>
> % git branch -d -r <tab>
>
> works. But this:
>
> % git -r -d <tab>
>
> doesn't.

Without 'branch'?


> I suppose, that's not intentional?

With the 'branch' there, both:

(i) git branch -d -r <tab>
and
(ii) git branch -r -d <tab>

seem to behave identically whether or not this patch is applied.  With 
or without the patch (i) seems fine AFAICT.  But (ii) doesn't seem to 
complete branches, even though I think it should.

-- 
Best,
Ben