On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 23:26, Frank Terbeck wrote:
>> Hm, with this patch, this:
>>
>> % git branch -d -r <tab>
>>
>> works. But this:
>>
>> % git -r -d <tab>
>>
>> doesn't.
>>
>> I suppose, that's not intentional?
>
> Well, it depends on what you’re after.  Writing -r first hints that 
> you want to list branches, not delete them.  If you look at the 
> synopsis in the man page, that’s how I’ve done it.  Does anyone have a 
> strong opinion on how this should be done?

It should complete remote branches in both cases, since git accepts 
remote branch(es) to delete in both cases.

-- 
Best,
Ben