From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21679 invoked by alias); 2 May 2011 00:40:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29121 Received: (qmail 1646 invoked from network); 2 May 2011 00:40:37 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at benizi.com designates 64.130.10.15 as permitted sender) Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 20:40:07 -0400 (EDT) From: "Benjamin R. Haskell" To: Peter Stephenson cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add openSUSE specific command completions In-Reply-To: <20110430175956.675b969a@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> Message-ID: References: <20110430175956.675b969a@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1463810530-1183311926-1304296831=:28316" ---1463810530-1183311926-1304296831=:28316 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sat, 30 Apr 2011, Peter Stephenson wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:49:43 +0200 İsmail Dönmez wrote: >> These completions were getting rot in openSUSE zsh package. It would >> be nice to get them included upstream. > > Thanks, just got back from holiday, skipped with glazed eyes over > zillions of emails but noticed this and committed it. I noticed that a couple of those (_osc and _zypper) had copyright notices in the files (which didn't seem to match the submitter), and that they were "released under the GPLv2." Are those okay to include without Zsh itself being GPL'ed? I see the LICENCE file states that "any provisions made in individual files take precedence." That makes it fine? (Asking out of curiosity more than anything.) -- Best, Ben ---1463810530-1183311926-1304296831=:28316--