From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-40363-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 21105 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2017 22:13:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 40363
Received: (qmail 28005 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2017 22:13:09 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mercury.zanshin.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <schaefer@brasslantern.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(64.84.47.142):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 0.753278 secs); 14 Jan 2017 22:13:09 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at ipost.com designates 64.84.47.142 as permitted sender)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:12:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Reply-To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: BUG: Zsh crashes
In-Reply-To: <20170114221052.12a4539b@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1701141411460.4560@toltec.zanshin.com>
References: <CGME20170113174208epcas1p109452434d2f95e52b24e49029ce15943@epcas1p1.samsung.com> <DB6PR1001MB10324259D98A08DA4938F0E6D7780@DB6PR1001MB1032.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20170113175242.16210658@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <20170114010859.GA22474@tower.spodhuis.org>
 <20170114024833.GA26958@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <20170114203624.2c396d08@ntlworld.com> <20170114221052.12a4539b@ntlworld.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
X-Face: "f/X=UCVgd*^c>+x(gMq0at?e:woX+;'snkkRzc3SX<0AZ (/PS4.M2hzGS9X:Qj]at_H/%a9K}:-eS<"v_7vX84PG9Bf Zpb`wI!I4geY=or+nWq`3CX`oq&TJR;g^ps|7(MH?jh;bs %vHJfCh5>a*6Re5m|Bidja\\o]>n\A)ib1:yX*T`zR(*h~ %tOw<~!D9{e6h!8M2:d8G2@K>y^1I_Vdy\d\MYe]z7c
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017, Peter Stephenson wrote:

> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:36:24 +0000
> Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > Removing the "=" after flowgraph stops it ("it" includes any reports of
> > errors in mem.c, of course).  So this points at something to do with how
> > _values handles values.
>
> Can someone else see if this helps?

That's certainly the direction my investigation was going.  It almost
*has* to be *something* about bin_compvalues().