From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-45075-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d4393beb
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 25812 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2019 03:57:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 45075
Received: (qmail 25613 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Dec 2019 03:57:24 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.102.1/25663. spamassassin: 3.4.2.  
 Clear:RC:0(64.147.123.24):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. 
 Processed in 4.546274 secs); 18 Dec 2019 03:57:24 -0000
X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-ME-Sender: <xms:fKP5XUNexFyER9pccIqQQ4fL4hTSSHM6agRgnQ2DxeN7Hf-JuiLwFw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvddtkedgieehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
    fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
    uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfffhffvufgtsehttdertd
    erredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfffgrnhhivghlucfuhhgrhhgrfhdfuceougdrshesuggrnhhi
    vghlrdhshhgrhhgrfhdrnhgrmhgvqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugdrsh
    esuggrnhhivghlrdhshhgrhhgrfhdrnhgrmhgvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:fKP5XcPI5ZdLWc98YAiYAuez9abN-CCAzkXNdyOywl3W-Tze2fvw8g>
    <xmx:fKP5XYUKDOiQygX6bWMpkQ4xTvfsNEScjZDPLz3tpM3n2He_cRSd8w>
    <xmx:fKP5Xfv6U3p_V-9R5faORgGZ6lR7JYNBg5_kdB8TbwtRJ7VrWgF3cA>
    <xmx:fKP5XRPGbsUwUGyCHIFZVtdxYa1LAM8SZOGfvTnEMOSI95OJCvIm9g>
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-694-gd5bab98-fmstable-20191218v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b54ed361-ce23-46d5-b5e3-71adcfb5bd6b@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 03:56:23 +0000
From: "Daniel Shahaf" <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: { exit } always { foo }
Content-Type: text/plain

The documentation of the try-always construct says:

    An tt(exit) command (or a tt(return) command executed at the outermost
    function level of a script) encountered in tt(try-list) does em(not) cause
    the execution of var(always-list).  Instead, the shell exits immediately
    after any tt(EXIT) trap has been executed.

However, A01grammar.ztst expects the always-list to be run:

  723	  (
  724	  mywrap() { echo BEGIN; true; echo END }
  725	  mytest() { { exit 3 } always { mywrap }; print Exited before this }
  726	  mytest
  727	  print Exited before this, too
  728	  )
  729	3:Exit and always block with functions: simple
  730	>BEGIN
  731	>END

Which is correct, the manual or the test?