From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 27355 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2022 06:35:35 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Mar 2022 06:35:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id: Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=e28wjzmlTQM5YpWcOnFAL0n4P+4Trn8Pva9KvfmyZXI=; b=jojyi2co1z1jSSufsGaJJg5it6 CTo1XSzbp5uQgX1KWhtZ9yarubmx6tjsF1jR2Q7zLPEhtlemWGwNJZXMU5yzqi/9OvE8Zwg8FGfkg 0ZSC6+Nog7xM/rkw8GfAFLNy2zih2lSYLMfMwrqeirXRz95e6NRkesVDG8zh5n2YObPaAhhneg+Ej xyIG1jlkil4I2x+5oOJyvc5fS4eUg4zgOAtBlr45Zh18V69dEYvbJELgHXLTBuB5Z4hge8wkl28gv hOEoFas61le8EGHoy06TPoacY9HyhRsUCPBgQxbaI28NguJLcuQGqWuhvosUpdHBg5eZvu+I4inn3 6jI6uIIg==; Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with local id 1nQO0r-0000YS-Av; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 06:35:33 +0000 Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1nQO0b-0000Fb-1S; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 06:35:17 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF1F27C005B; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 01:35:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap48 ([10.202.2.98]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 05 Mar 2022 01:35:14 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddtledgleefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpefnrgif rhgvnhgtvggpgggvlhojiihquhgviicuoehlrghrrhihvhesiihshhdrohhrgheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueefheelieekieejtdfggfetheehiedvtdeiudekjedvjefgjedu feekveelgfegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homheplhgrrhhrhihvodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqdduudeh udekjeejtdegqdduudelvdejfeekhedqlhgrrhhrhihvpeepiihshhdrohhrghesfhgrsh htmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5DA6121E006E; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 01:35:14 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-4778-g14fba9972e-fm-20220217.001-g14fba997 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20220304132616.GC7687@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> References: <19afce8d-8efe-5d9b-2fce-e0cabbf6d768@disroot.org> <20220303223727.m6ta53ljytlnxfjz@sym.noone.org> <53018a28-cbdc-497d-af96-e3fbbf9c4d61@www.fastmail.com> <6587c04f-215b-40c0-a7b9-cb92a27bc354@www.fastmail.com> <20220304132616.GC7687@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 01:34:53 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= To: "Daniel Shahaf" Cc: "David Wales" , zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: CSS for Zsh website? Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Seq: 49808 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Fri, Mar 4, 2022, at 8:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Lawrence Vel=C3=A1zquez wrote on Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 21:44:48 -0500: >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, at 7:12 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: >> > Soft disagree. Setting width to 80 characters is no more necessary >> > than allowing it to be 100% of the viewport. The only time to use >> > character widths is with fixed-width fonts. Set margins, not width= s. >>=20 >> Agreed! I didn't mean to defend the specific CSS that was proffered. > > I'm confused. Didn't you just now post a link that explains why widths > should be set rather than margins? Quoting from there [with emphasis > removed]: > > There isn=E2=80=99t one margin size that will work for all web pag= es, but > the core advice is the same as on the printed page=E2=80=94focus o= n line > length. Sorry, I meant to agree with the notion that a fixed character width is inappropriate. --=20 vq