From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16168 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2012 08:05:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 30765 Received: (qmail 29048 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2012 08:05:13 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: softfail (ns1.primenet.com.au: transitioning SPF record at _spf-ssg-c.microsoft.com does not designate 130.207.165.83 as permitted sender) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <6067bc029dd49d1c0e27eda7a6a0750e@archlinux.de> References: <20121026015717.GA1325@Hailey> <6067bc029dd49d1c0e27eda7a6a0750e@archlinux.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [RFC] zsh completion for systemd From: Daniel Wallace Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 03:47:29 -0400 To: Pierre Schmitz ,zsh-workers@zsh.org Message-ID: X-GT-AVAS-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.10.28.73615 X-GT-Spam-Details: Internal Mail X-GT-Spam-Rating: (0%) X-GT-True-Rating: (28%) Pierre Schmitz wrote: >Am 26.10.2012 10:53, schrieb Peter Stephenson: >> On 26 October 2012 02:57, Daniel Wallace >wrote: >>> So, I have expanded the zsh completion for systemd to include all of >>> the *ctl commands. I really think it should be in the upstream >package >>> though, but I started with the completion from the zsh repos. So I >>> just wanted to make sure that it was ok before I sent the completion >>> upstream to systemd. >> >> Anything that works is fine... you can send the diffs here, too. > >It would make sense to remove the completion from zsh then. Also it would need to be re licensed as systemd uses LGPLv2.1 which isn't compatible with gplv3.