From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16049 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 23:21:34 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=3.2.0 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 23:21:34 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 11324 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 23:21:28 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 23:21:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 1563 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2007 23:21:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 23551 Received: (qmail 1552 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 23:21:23 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 23:21:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 10922 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2007 23:21:23 -0000 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (209.85.146.180) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 11 Jun 2007 23:21:19 -0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so2390246wah for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:21:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sk69B1XsBoA19ATsWxHV6+nwUnHzQDBuCJca761PLOayMXEJHM/Zv9J1jkuBkJ4Q+ud+GDHfDovvT0KjhSRog0ZgL+l50ZY9zs2rmAj57IUNbpWP8je3qCFUx6Kw4j1JW3B9Hh5SsQtjFBrOsAucyov3kL79kmYj2+LWWV1l2Tc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n34k6ZczfN5iQiUtllthVezR5bb2nba7h6r1Q5adDmabYEMT6tD5iJqmNuCcr3mcu9fifOiFv7BCHEnfsgF+SuToftyoKrq8MR1hCS9t7f0iStHO8pYgC0ibWvcjVdUZct1VEgHVg2/Dv2ZnjnOWAeMNFxJNdgNFRdpzaDf0DAI= Received: by 10.114.210.2 with SMTP id i2mr6040172wag.1181604077600; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.171.6 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:21:17 -0300 From: "Caio Marcelo" To: "Peter Stephenson" Subject: Re: zsh stable release, or is 4.3.4 stable enough for Fedora? Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk In-Reply-To: <200706112210.l5BMAH2T003653@pwslaptop.csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200706112210.l5BMAH2T003653@pwslaptop.csr.com> Hello, On 6/11/07, Peter Stephenson wrote: > Strictly speaking, 4.3.4 isn't stable in quite the same way 4.2 is. > How ever, that's less because it's broken than because it's a moving > target; "unstable" means "it keeps changing" rather than "it doesn't > work". I don't think there are big problems with broken code. > (...) > This doesn't answer the question about when it's going to appear because > I don't yet know. Thanks for the detailed update on the project status. > On balance, I think most users would probably benefit from upgrading. > The thing to worry about is less stability in terms of bugs, since I > don't see much evidence that's a problem, and more stability in terms of > features; see for example the list of incompatibilities in the README > file. >>From my (little) experience, what you said and the fact that both Ubuntu and Gentoo (other well-known distros) are already using 4.3.x somehow, I think it's time to Fedora go this way too. Anyway, I'll report your answer in Fedora bugzilla and see what the package maintainers think about. Cheers, Caio Marcelo