Hey, it looks like the Fedora crowd has decided that was a bug that surfaced already a while ago, which they then fixed, which then re-surfaced, as described in the newest comment on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2212160#c3 : > This is the same bug as #1277996. > It was fix by commit b5cac6b for zsh rpm by adding > export LIBLDFLAGS='-z lazy' > to zsh.spec. > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zsh/c/b5cac6b431f08c03d2712fa9aac41b7cb43b9384 > > But in recent Fedora '-z lazy' does not overwrite the '-Wl,-z,now'. It _seems_ we need to use '-Wl,-z,lazy'. > To summarize that #1277996 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277996 , this *does* seem to actually be a bug: https://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2015/msg02981.html Something must have reintroduced "now" instead of "lazy" linking in the module linking process. Best, Marcus On 05.06.23 22:07, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 12:35 PM Marcus Müller wrote: >> Ah, so we're exporting and thus overwriting a symbol that overwrites a >> pointer by the name of an existing libc function with a "overrides >> potentially unowned memory" one? > As I understand it that symbol will only be defined by tcp.c if it's > not available from libc or other linked library, so it's not actually > overwriting an identically-named symbol. > > Or at least that's the intention, the #ifdef's that are meant to > accomplish it may need refinement for more recent library changes.