From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6812 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2010 15:59:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27771 Received: (qmail 5779 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2010 15:59:00 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.218.227 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=vzA+zT3SPTuD9QUpqIbfTZd/yBhIpvt/mVL54bsRA6Y=; b=XosZwApXniUROgaln2IAj2NdYZzDQldQ0YdpekeEWVwYrHTCykdPj5DtfKTxlNO0AA DyxzOjBAqYD2B7U4s6Bb/9/YB9HcykvSVSbqUyUmMFH2wkGLUQoU5yJh3R+sKj0aWGT6 aAgcekekUDTL0PU+2tVr+V2JqGXNh2QTR0ePE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=WFXkqM1GiuY7LrRcVfX1HOyGaDnh5fCkavtM+dM0hV57jYsl9pQZ8d1R8JAR23eofN XhOQNLhJHMMDG0PFvplLCDWeDZC9QJe6NufqEyRdlnaBb28yZDGEAKlIPBjQKzYotn5J eSvcs7lgmShmFUzigFK2DHlhlAhmqE3esGwAU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nikolai.weibull@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <1267717516-10175-1-git-send-email-ft@bewatermyfriend.org> References: <1267717516-10175-1-git-send-email-ft@bewatermyfriend.org> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:52:49 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cdfb6ab35ec42b1a Message-ID: Subject: Re: PATCH: _git: support for user-specific sub commands From: Nikolai Weibull To: Frank Terbeck Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 16:45, Frank Terbeck wrote: > Documentation included on top of the _git file. Nice. > This also changes one > ':completion:${curcontext}:' to ":completion:${curcontext}:" (single > versus double quotes), which I believe is right. Was this still not fixed? I thought this had made the rounds a couple of times at least :-/. > Would you agree, Nikolai? Yes, this all seems right.