On 4 czerwca 2017 at 02:54:57, Bart Schaefer (schaefer@brasslantern.com) wrote:
> On Jun 3, 4:11pm, Sebastian Gniazdowski wrote:
> } Subject: Re: Improving zcompdump (Re: A patch with hashtable optimization,
> }
> } On 20 maja 2017 at 19:08:09, Bart Schaefer (schaefer@brasslantern.com) wrote:
> } > How much does zcompdump actually help? Have you compared startup with
> } > and without it?
> 
> Haven't seen that yet (nor tried it myself, tho).

It wasn't me in the "How does .."

> } > One lesson learned with Completion/Base/Utility/_store_cache is that
> } > parsing array assignments is expensive.
> }
> } Results seem to confirm what you said
> 
> I also tried something similar ... using the just the default set of
> completions, more wall-clock time is spent restoring the autoloads
> than loading the _comps array, at least on my system.

Could you try patch with single-allocation in mkautofn()? Chances are low, but who knows. The patch spans also to other non-heap Eprog allocation places.

--
Sebastian Gniazdowski
psprint /at/ zdharma.org