From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7448 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2021 20:40:24 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Apr 2021 20:40:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=AVVCOF8wJ9rx9UAZpWLP2mlv1rh9kB3yIw0t29Ssvq8=; b=hYdVeatKAjQ7lOiTqAQEtl4N9i 0YRO5+ZbLM8G10VI7qmbjcZfXB4H3bw9QHbzyunRhr3Qy/NNW7hzMrs2e2aPVNszwU85zWOkpm0mk iQ7x3FAAqvK7c0jdqdX7G/w360wTjo2ZzI8pjw8iKSU+TStsbgHv+lfTVo91hJD4z3ZyoRmMhTu8r /BE74fHH2ArVExsQU10kTLwcuHoq3X0BR+enxfd6g8J+QhT+kWezlzpo7/er6b+UnHBI3UPRZr/9z GDamnT29w4Hj3XyV6HcHPn0gUFtHuYpH1IU607B5ikjO9IaxHb3FhFY15q9kmOvbr0HyDbQbcYYg6 A5IH5GjQ==; Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with local id 1la2b8-000E0t-SV; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:40:22 +0000 Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1la2au-000DlG-LO; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 20:40:09 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183F727C0061; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:40:07 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdduvddgudehvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgrfihrvghntggvpgggvghljoiiqhhuvgiiuceolhgr rhhrhihvseiishhhrdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeikeejveeludegfeeigf eulefggfdttdegheevvdehvdeigfehvdffuedvvdeuheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlrghrrhihvhdomhgvshhmthhprghuth hhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqudduhedukeejjedtgedqudduledvjeefkeehqdhlrghr rhihvheppeiishhhrdhorhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3F88EA00079; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:40:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-403-gbc3c488b23-fm-20210419.005-gbc3c488b Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20210423222912.3060F674@volny.cz> References: <20210411141520.4ABA89D5@volny.cz> <20210413155236.GR6819@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <20210413200341.D91B3837@volny.cz> <20210414110355.GA31655@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <20210414134033.1AB3540B@volny.cz> <20210423141844.D01FC4C9@volny.cz> <20210423222912.3060F674@volny.cz> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:39:45 -0400 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= To: zeurkous@volny.cz Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: revised patch: zshmisc(1) clarify non-successful exit statuses Content-Type: text/plain X-Seq: 48674 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, at 4:29 PM, zeurkous@volny.cz wrote: > YMMV -- especially the word "non-script" is awkward to me. That final clause is admittedly difficult to express cleanly, and I'm not completely pleased with my result. But "is not a script and in a format unrecognized by the operating system" is ungrammatical and shouldn't be committed as is. Perhaps: "The executable file has insufficient permissions, is a directory or special file, or is not a script and is in a format unrecognized by the operating system." > But that's bikeshedding... I don't consider grammar correction to be bikeshedding. -- vq