From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5015 invoked from network); 28 Jun 1997 06:49:13 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Jun 1997 06:49:13 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA03985; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 02:41:51 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 02:41:51 -0400 (EDT) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: FYI: zsh 3.0.4 works on SCO OS's References: <199706280607.CAA05108@hzoli.home> From: Jason Zapman II Date: 28 Jun 1997 02:45:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: Zoltan Hidvegi's message of Sat, 28 Jun 1997 02:07:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15 Resent-Message-ID: <"f1_vM.0.9-.k8Bjp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3324 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Zoltan Hidvegi writes: > Well, there are several other OS'es missing from Etc/MACHINES. Currently > I do not know about any 32 or more bit Unix like OS where zsh cannot be > compiled (at least after some little modifications). Perhaps > Etc/MACHINES should only mention those systems where some manual > intervention may be necessary to compile zsh. I would argue for maybe a paragraph at the end saying something to the effect of: Zsh is known to compile cleanly on: Solaris 2.x, SunOS 4.1.x, SCO OpenUnix, ... HPUX 10.x etc. Maybe alphabitise the list... One more opinion in the vast sea known as the internet... Jason -- --------------Jason Price Theta Xi, BA 449 zapman@cc.gatech.edu------------- "You come of the Lord Adam and the Lady Eve, and that is both honor enough to erect the head of the poorest beggar, and shame enough to bow the shoulders of the greatest emperor in earth." -- Aslan, King over all High Kings of Narnia