From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA04679 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 19:06:34 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA05067; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 05:05:49 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 05:05:49 -0400 (EDT) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Running zsh as sh (Was: Announcement draft) References: <199608010831.KAA28871@hydra.ifh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.74) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: bas@astro.uva.nl (Bas V. de Bakker) Date: 01 Aug 1996 11:04:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: Peter Stephenson's message of Thu, 01 Aug 1996 10:31:03 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.37/Emacs 19.31 Resent-Message-ID: <"RUkv23.0.2F1.iD70o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1862 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Peter Stephenson writes: > By the way: some time after 3.0 is released and stable (preferably > not in that order :-/) it would be quite nice to have ksh/sh > emulation as a command line option, to avoid what I had to do above > (linking zsh under sh, when there's a real sh on the machine, is no > nicer). I agree that a command line option would be useful, but you can already do this quite easily using: % ARGV0=sh zsh script Bas.