From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id EAA12816 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 1996 04:00:55 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA22623; Sat, 29 Jun 1996 13:55:00 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 13:55:00 -0400 (EDT) Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (ZSH Workers Mailing List) Subject: Re: Sigh. Wouldn't consistency be nice? References: <2092.199606291641@tamarind.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> From: Hrvoje Niksic Date: 29 Jun 1996 19:53:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: Zefram's message of Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:41:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.25/XEmacs 19.14 Resent-Message-ID: <"meJV52.0.PX5.ptMrn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1479 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Zefram (A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk) wrote: > (Yes, consistency would be nice. And I'm surprised that bash, being a > GNU program, didn't produce the same answer as zsh, which gets it from > autoconf.) This is because bash does not use autoconf, having its own autoconfiguration facilities. The bash FAQ states that bash-2.0 will probably support the GNU autoconf. -- hniksic@srce.hr | Student of electrical engineering hniksic@fly.cc.fer.hr | University of Zagreb, Croatia ------------------------------------------------------------------ The IDIOT. Usually a cretin, morpohodite, or old COBOL programmer selected to be the system administrator by a committee of cretins, morphodites, and old COBOL programmers.