From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA00506 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 1996 00:00:48 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA17659; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:47:17 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:47:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 29 Jul 96 10:43 EST From: Carlos Carvalho To: Zoltan Hidvegi , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Patches missing from pre4? In-Reply-To: <199607291257.OAA01845@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> References: <199607291257.OAA01845@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> Resent-Message-ID: <"ivVw41.0.oJ4.a3C_n"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1818 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Zoltan Hidvegi (hzoli@cs.elte.hu) wrote on 29 July 1996 14:57: >You probably noticed that all of these fixes were very minor. None of them >affect the stability of zsh. Agreed. What I mean is that there have been significant changes at each new pre- release, so I think we should wait somewhat longer before making the official release. On the other hand, since you're leaving for hollidays, it'd be nice to have another pre with all the latest fixes, so that the list can pound on it. Another advantage is that we don't have to apply the patches by hand :-) Anyway, it's a bad idea to make an official release just before an absence period of the maintainer. Carlos