From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4546 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2009 04:02:18 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Jan 2009 04:02:18 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 92502 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2009 04:02:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 22 Jan 2009 04:02:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 26460 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2009 04:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 26403 Received: (qmail 26449 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2009 04:02:06 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 22 Jan 2009 04:02:06 -0000 Received: from QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.48]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1681B80271F0 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:01:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6HT41b0090cZkys55U1ogQ; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:01:48 +0000 Received: from smtp.klanderman.net ([98.217.254.247]) by OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 6U1o1b00A5M2Np63WU1ogw; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:01:48 +0000 Received: from lwm.klanderman.net (unknown [192.168.100.50]) by smtp.klanderman.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32641B30147 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:01:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by lwm.klanderman.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0B1419FC5EF; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:01:47 -0500 (EST) From: Greg Klanderman To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: changing bindings in isearch mode? Reply-To: gak@klanderman.net Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:01:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <090119091757.ZM5344@torch.brasslantern.com> (Bart Schaefer's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:17:55 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) References: <18801.32959.693653.15539@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20090117175659.1a37c70f@pws-pc> <20090119094453.4f66076b@news01> <20090119121204.4697b6a2@news01> <090119091757.ZM5344@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/8886/Wed Jan 21 23:46:06 2009 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean >>>>> Bart Schaefer writes: > accept-search is no different than undefined-key in this context, Actually, that's not true. If a key is undefined in the isearch map, it is looked up in the main map, whereas if a key is bound to accept-search in the isearch map, it has the desired effect. Greg