From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5857 invoked from network); 29 May 2009 14:39:20 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from new-brage.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.254.104) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 May 2009 14:39:20 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 22457 invoked from network); 29 May 2009 14:39:09 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 May 2009 14:39:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 26361 invoked by alias); 29 May 2009 14:39:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 27019 Received: (qmail 26334 invoked from network); 29 May 2009 14:39:00 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 29 May 2009 14:39:00 -0000 Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC66280307FA for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 16:38:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xS211b00d17dt5G53SdxUa; Fri, 29 May 2009 14:37:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.klanderman.net ([98.217.254.247]) by OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xSev1b00E5M2Np63ZSewHu; Fri, 29 May 2009 14:38:56 +0000 Received: from lwm.klanderman.net (unknown [192.168.100.50]) by smtp.klanderman.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9544CB30147 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:38:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lwm.klanderman.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7E6919FC61B; Fri, 29 May 2009 10:38:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Greg Klanderman To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Add CORRECT_NOCOMPSYS option Reply-To: gak@klanderman.net Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:38:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200905290832.n4T8WYRv003614@news01.csr.com> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Fri, 29 May 2009 09:32:34 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux) References: <1238890030-4683-1-git-send-email-ft@bewatermyfriend.org> <090404193718.ZM19801@torch.brasslantern.com> <20090405191304.1908fca8@pws-pc> <090405151115.ZM13159@torch.brasslantern.com> <20090406100929.505617e2@news01> <2d460de70905270930j681da6a5kf7848d67d89f0c69@mail.gmail.com> <20090527175941.3bbe2eba@news01> <2d460de70905280148iebfcegcb4143c33e510efd@mail.gmail.com> <20090528092514.GA3315@fsst.voodoo.lan> <20090528203552.36019db3@pws-pc> <200905290832.n4T8WYRv003614@news01.csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9405/Fri May 29 12:01:16 2009 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean >>>>> Peter Stephenson writes: > Needless to say, if we > can reclaim this for the human race, comment it, and make it fit > together in a way that makes it possible to maintain, it would be a huge > help. I suppose there's no hope of getting Sven to help us add some comments? Anyway, sounds like as any of us spend any time in this code we need to make a point of adding comments with anything we learn and get those committed to the codebase. Do those two uses of GLOBDOTS in computil.c happen to make any sense to you? greg