From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28497-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 8767 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2010 22:25:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28497
Received: (qmail 24068 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2010 22:25:18 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at klanderman.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Greg Klanderman <gak@klanderman.net>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PROMPT_SP and empty PROMPT_EOL_MARK
Reply-To: gak@klanderman.net
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:16:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Ox8duCu=oxZ+bE=kYfyp5QY4KdsDx77pskbuG@mail.gmail.com> (Mikael Magnusson's message of "Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:44:36 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3y682k0mr.fsf@klanderman.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
References: <AANLkTikjsQPt5QCCJnFGRJswVq_N=3P+fNnYhCSYdkQ0@mail.gmail.com>
	<m34oaqljvv.fsf@klanderman.net>
	<AANLkTi=Ox8duCu=oxZ+bE=kYfyp5QY4KdsDx77pskbuG@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

>>>>> On December 6, 2010 Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Because that's not what promptsp does?

Yes, of course, sorry about that.. your proposed change
makes sense, and I see pws has already committed it.
I hadn't really thought about it when I originally
submitted the patch that created PROMPT_EOL_MARK (pws
renamed the parameter if I recall correctly).

Greg