From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-9506-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.auc.dk>
Received: (qmail 996 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2000 14:31:04 -0000
Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Feb 2000 14:31:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 19472 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2000 14:30:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 9506
Received: (qmail 19464 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2000 14:30:56 -0000
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: zsh/complist and compinit
X-Attribution: adl
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz <duret_g@epita.fr>
Date: 01 Feb 2000 15:29:32 +0100
Message-ID: <mvbhfft808j.fsf@phobos.lrde.epita.fr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

A small question about menu completion:

This will work:

phobos% zmodload zsh/complist
phobos% autoload -U compinit 
phobos% compinit
phobos% bindkey m menu-select 
phobos% echo /<M-m>

while this won't:

phobos% autoload -U compinit 
phobos% compinit
phobos% zmodload zsh/complist
phobos% bindkey m menu-select 
phobos% echo /<M-m>

Does the order of compinit and complist really matters?

-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz