From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [130.207.244.244]) by werple.net.au (8.7/8.7) with SMTP id RAA09199 for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 17:49:56 +1000 (EST)
Received: from gauss (gauss.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA07066
  (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>); Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:43:18 -0400
Received: by gauss (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA06831; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:39:54 -0400
Resent-Date: 11 Oct 1995 08:43:30 U
Old-Return-Path: <heading_anthony@jpmorgan.com>
Message-Id: <n1398739482.745@smtpgwprod.ny.jpmorgan.com>
Date: 11 Oct 1995 08:43:30 U
From: "Heading, Anthony" <heading_anthony@jpmorgan.com>
Subject: RE: reply behavoir for zsh's mailing lists
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-MS 3.0.1
Resent-Message-Id: <"iw24G3.0.fg1.9JtUm"@gauss>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/447
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

>Some (broken) auto-reply programs will actually remove some of the mail
>headers when they send an automatic reply...

Doesn't that call for a pragmatic hack?  A limit of ten messages a day for
each sender (except the hard-core junkies who could have 50)?  And just
desubscribe anyone with a broken robot.


A