From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27743 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2009 11:51:49 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 11:51:49 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 88786 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2009 11:51:46 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 11:51:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 20554 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2009 11:51:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 27234 Received: (qmail 20539 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2009 11:51:41 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 11:51:41 -0000 Received: from mail-pz0-f173.google.com (mail-pz0-f173.google.com [209.85.222.173]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EA38043AC9 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:51:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so1920705pzk.31 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:mime-version :message-id:date:to:from:subject:content-type; bh=rtn2oEObqbrbjZS3omkfRAIXxZJwftWCiTyY+qywg6Q=; b=w0m2X8NRcoY4Tk02Zd/Dw4qfTb5cYNmTf04yuNX1/1JeJFAxSp2Csv8P4Zahy/6Y+5 LgefRn7njL+4BRISHgmbWd2+v+oQJrYozyNtaZGQSMNgJK/QrmZiz5ZJmoCsc5UebKWK KQpEmllG8EVX8D3eSI1LpFaaxPJfLCoNwh4Xc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:mime-version:message-id:date:to:from:subject:content-type; b=HPLi58PDHY6gqgszsEuUlR7LXVgWYrHNBKu6LUu2ewSaqoI21mZ1cNb+0tZhKjQwFp bmfF2HvdkI7igYajjF/chCM9AG+Iht1bN9z1ZjtTW65jZWDljIF+ewuWNg6MuQNqzSeZ GzEeRaShJYBpNnCCRgkgH++KF4krqvC1JI3bM= Received: by 10.114.54.15 with SMTP id c15mr557298waa.193.1251419441582; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? (c-76-126-216-24.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.216.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n33sm1662930wag.19.2009.08.27.17.30.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Dave Yost Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:46:06 -0700 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk From: Dave Yost Subject: completion problems with {x,y} Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9756/Fri Aug 28 12:43:25 2009 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean Consider: 0 303 Z% ls foo.cc foo.hh specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc specWhatever.cc 0 304 Z% diff spec{ specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc specWhatever.cc so far so good. But now look at this: 0 300 Z% diff spec{F gets this 0 304 Z% diff spec{FooBar.cc, specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc specWhatever.cc instead, recognizing at completing all the way through the .cc is not useful, it should get this: 0 300 Z% diff spec{FooBar, specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc specWhatever.cc Then this, 0 304 Z% diff spec{FooBar,T gets this 0 304 Z% diff spec{FooBar,Thingy.cc, specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc specWhatever.cc but should get this 0 304 Z% diff spec{FooBar,Thingy, specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc specWhatever.cc Also, if we rm specWhatever.cc, we get this: 0 305 Z% diff spec{ specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc so far so good. But then this 0 305 Z% diff spec{F specFooBar.cc specThingy.cc should go all the way to this: 0 305 Z% diff spec{FooBar,Thingy}.cc because what else could I possibly want from tab completion here?