From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7068 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2000 19:02:01 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Mar 2000 19:02:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 599 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2000 19:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9964 Received: (qmail 585 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2000 19:01:50 -0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: Misc. module stuff References: <1000301182139.ZM11795@candle.brasslantern.com> <1000301184015.ZM11824@candle.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by AKEMI 1.13.2 - =?ISO-2022-JP?B?Ig==?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQTA0Y0s8GyhCIg==?=) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Tanaka Akira Date: 02 Mar 2000 04:01:35 +0900 In-Reply-To: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Wed, 1 Mar 2000 18:40:15 +0000" Message-ID: User-Agent: Chao-gnus/6.12.5 AKEMI/1.13.2 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQTAbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNGNLPBsoQg==?=) FLAM-DOODLE/1.12.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCM3cbKEI=?= 10R4.0/5.0) Emacs/20.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) In article <1000301184015.ZM11824@candle.brasslantern.com>, "Bart Schaefer" writes: > By the way, when I added 51xtrace.ztst it was not my intention to start > a trend. I think most tests should be numbered *before* 50cd.ztst -- > the only reason I chose 51 for xtrace is that it isn't testing an actual > programming construct or user interaction. The tests from 01* to 10* > are sort of marching their way through the manual checking features of > major sections -- for which completion certainly qualifies, even if > zregex does not -- and I didn't want to interrupt that sequence with > something as low-profile as xtrace. I see. > So at some point I think that at least the completion test ought to get > renamed to a lower number. I agree. -- Tanaka Akira