From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu>
Received: (qmail 19460 invoked from network); 28 Oct 1998 02:46:37 -0000
Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Oct 1998 02:46:37 -0000
Received: (from list@localhost)
	by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id VAA28853;
	Tue, 27 Oct 1998 21:38:37 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 21:38:37 -0500 (EST)
To: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: Re: Explanation for no completion candidates.
References: <rsqemrueps9.fsf@crane.jaist.ac.jp>
 <981026210405.ZM12601@candle.brasslantern.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.10.2 - "Higashi-Kanazawa")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Tanaka Akira <akr@jaist.ac.jp>
Date: 28 Oct 1998 11:38:39 +0900
In-Reply-To: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Mon, 26 Oct 1998 21:04:04 -0800"
Message-ID: <rsq7lxl5s28.fsf@crane.jaist.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Chao-gnus/6.9.7 SEMI/1.10.2 (Higashi-Kanazawa)
 FLAM-DOODLE/1.11.2 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCPz88axsoQg==?= 2.5R4.5/10.0)
 Emacs/20.3.91 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
Resent-Message-ID: <"TiPNA1.0.j27.jEeDs"@math>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/4462
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

In article <981026210405.ZM12601@candle.brasslantern.com>,
  "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@brasslantern.com> writes:

> > However, zsh-3.0.5 and zsh-3.1.4 has different behavior on "-X".
> 
> I think that's on purpose ... search the zsh-workers archive for the
> pattern
> 	compctl;explanation
> and you'll see quite a bit of discussion about it.  The end of that thread
> seems to imply that your patch should not be used.

OK. I understand the purpose and 3.1.4 behavior.

Thanks.
-- 
[Tanaka Akira]