From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20469 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2000 10:16:28 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Feb 2000 10:16:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 28697 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2000 10:16:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 9899 Received: (qmail 28686 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2000 10:16:21 -0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: Questions/comments on completion code that arise from PWS's zsh guide References: <200002280936.KAA02281@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by AKEMI 1.13.2 - =?ISO-2022-JP?B?Ig==?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQTA0Y0s8GyhCIg==?=) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Tanaka Akira Date: 28 Feb 2000 19:16:08 +0900 In-Reply-To: Sven Wischnowsky's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:36:43 +0100 (MET)" Message-ID: User-Agent: Chao-gnus/6.12.5 AKEMI/1.13.2 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQTAbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNGNLPBsoQg==?=) FLAM-DOODLE/1.12.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCM3cbKEI=?= 10R4.0/5.0) Emacs/20.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) In article <200002280936.KAA02281@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de>, Sven Wischnowsky writes: > Maybe we should change _telnet, it's really broken for me because it > doesn't even guess that my telnet supports -l. I think we should > change the default specs to _arguments. Or are there any telnets > without a -l option? Tanaka? Most poor telnet I know is on SunOS 4. Z:akr@sulfer% telnet -h -h: unknown host telnet> It supports no options. -- Tanaka Akira