From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8773 invoked from network); 14 Nov 1998 12:40:56 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Nov 1998 12:40:56 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id HAA07793; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 07:40:20 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 07:40:20 -0500 (EST) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Path: mason From: mason@primenet.com.au (Geoff Wing) Newsgroups: lists.zsh.workers Subject: Re: PATCH: */* broken (Re: PATCH: 3.1.5: ``***'' symlink follow broken) Date: 14 Nov 1998 12:38:56 GMT Organization: PrimeNet Computer Consultants Message-ID: References: <19981113175933.A18622@primenet.com.au> <981113091530.ZM17187@candle.brasslantern.com> Reply-To: mason@primenet.com.au NNTP-Posting-Host: coral.primenet.com.au X-Trace: coral.primenet.com.au 911047136 8638 203.43.15.2 (14 Nov 1998 12:38:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@coral.primenet.com.au NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Nov 1998 12:38:56 GMT User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.4 (UNIX) Resent-Message-ID: <"g4wJs3.0.fv1.qeNJs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4632 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Bart Schaefer typed: :On Nov 13, 5:59pm, Geoff Wing wrote: :} Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.1.5: ``***'' symlink follow broken :} I've got a much better patch for it now. Just above the line ``if (dirs) {'' :} put ``#if 0'' and after the closing brace for it, put "#endif" :Here's a patch that makes the code similar (not identical, there are other :changes that had to be kept) to the 3.0.5 version of the same section. Wow, that patch looked suspiciously like it had _exactly_ the same functionality as my descriptive ``#if 0'' patch. Isn't it amazing how you can have a total lack a sobriety and still type properly? -- Geoff Wing Mobile : 0412 162 441 Work URL: http://www.primenet.com.au/ Ego URL: http://pobox.com/~gcw/