From: Bruce Stephens <b.stephens@isode.com>
To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk
Subject: Re: Associative array ordering and selective unset (Re: Example function)
Date: 01 Feb 1999 17:39:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vb4sp6dnwf.fsf@snake.isode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:02:46 -0800"
"Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@brasslantern.com> writes:
> On Feb 1, 11:48am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
> } Subject: Re: Example function
> }
> } I was thinking about this... we could make the code keep a counter in
> } assoc arrays, increment it whenever a new key is added and store the
> } current value in the structure for this new element. Then we can treat
> } the whole thing as being sorted by `time of addition'.
> }
> } Hm, does this sound like the right thing?
>
> Almost. Something about it doesn't seem quite right to me, but I
> can't put my finger on what different behavior I'd expect.
It would be a bit tricky to reorder the associative array, wouldn't
it? i.e., if I set up some configuration, and then want to insert
some pattern before some others, then I'd need to recreate the
associative array. Maybe that's OK, but it feels a bit awkward.
Emacs (and other Lisps) has assoc-lists, which is maybe a better model
for this: they're explicitly lists (so they have ordering), but you
can access them by key. I've no idea how this would map onto a shell,
but perhaps this is saying that associative arrays don't quite fit
what's wanted.
> I don't like the idea that every parameter table hash would end up
> with another integer of overhead in every entry, but maybe that's
> not so bad.
I agree, the extra integer is probably trivial.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-01 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-01 10:48 Example function Sven Wischnowsky
1999-02-01 17:02 ` Associative array ordering and selective unset (Re: Example function) Bart Schaefer
1999-02-01 17:39 ` Bruce Stephens [this message]
1999-02-01 19:09 ` Bart Schaefer
1999-02-02 20:07 ` Phil Pennock
1999-02-02 7:52 Sven Wischnowsky
1999-02-02 8:01 Sven Wischnowsky
1999-02-02 16:58 Sven Wischnowsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vb4sp6dnwf.fsf@snake.isode.com \
--to=b.stephens@isode.com \
--cc=zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).