From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Sender: B.Stephens@isode.com To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: set -A and stat -A vs. typeset -A and stat -H References: <990128014724.ZM32736@candle.brasslantern.com> <19990128132316.B19607@fysh.org> <990128093329.ZM1677@candle.brasslantern.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Bruce Stephens Date: 28 Jan 1999 17:43:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:33:29 -0800" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.070069 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.69) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) X-Mailing-List: 5095 "Bart Schaefer" writes: > On Jan 28, 1:23pm, Phil Pennock wrote: > } "What are four lowercase letters that are not legal flag arguments > } to the Berkeley UNIX version of `ls'?" > } > } HAND (and no, the first two letters of that are just coincidence). > > Um, HAND are not lowercase letters ... and BSD `ls' does use -A. ;-> > (My answer would be e j v y, but I had to think about it for too > long.) The ls I've got doesn't use h, but it certainly uses a, n and d. Are there really versions of ls which don't support a or d? I use those options all the time. Anyway, that shows there's room for expansion, should zls need more options.