From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25500 invoked from network); 10 Jun 1998 12:32:33 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Jun 1998 12:32:33 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA07252; Wed, 10 Jun 1998 08:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 08:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Sender: B.Stephens@isode.com To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Associative arrays, structured namespaces References: <199806101044.LAA12918@taos.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Bruce Stephens Date: 10 Jun 1998 13:28:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: Bruce Stephens's message of "10 Jun 1998 13:07:29 +0100" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.10/XEmacs 19.16 - "Lille" Resent-Message-ID: <"Catg_2.0.Fn1.VldVr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4089 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Bruce Stephens writes: > Yes, I wasn't thinking clearly. I was thinking that adding a SET > function to shell.path (which would be called shell.SET, I suppose) Slow brain strikes again. That should presumably be "shell.path.SET".