Bogus tempfile names in beta18

Bogus tempfile names in beta18

[Vinnie Shelton]

This bug has been around for awhile.  Someone (Peter?) sent a fix, but I 
foolishly discarded it, assuming that fix would be incorporated in beta18.  
Basically, the bug is that filenames for =() substitution are not unique.  Eg:

: zsh-2.6-beta18/SunOS Wed 22 11:02; Src/zsh -f
spacely% echo $ZSH_VERSION
2.6-beta18
spacely% uname -a 
SunOS spacely 4.1.3_U1 2 sun4m
spacely% echo =(ls /tmp) =(ls)
/tmp/zsha19197 /tmp/zshb19197

If one were to diff those (supposedly) two files, they would apparently be the 
same, even though they should be different.

--vin

Re: Bogus tempfile names in beta18

[Zoltan Hidvegi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: application/pgp, Size: 3164 bytes --]

Re: Bogus tempfile names in beta18

[Mark Borges]

>> On Wed, 22 May 1996 11:09:17 -0400,
>> Vinnie Shelton(vs) wrote:
vs> This bug has been around for awhile.  Someone (Peter?) sent a fix,
Yes, it was Peter. You can always get it back from the archive:

  X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/1061

But it *is* apparently already in b18:

  $ patch < ~/tmp/keep1d/b18p2
  ...
  Patching file Src/exec.c using Plan A...
  Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] n
  Apply anyway? [n]        

though the bug persists:

  $ echo $ZSH_VERSION
  2.6-beta18
  $ print =(cat ~/.zshrc) =(cat ~/.zshenv)
  /tmp/zsha000MD /tmp/zshb000MD

-- 
  -mb-

Re: Bogus tempfile names in beta18

[Mark Borges]

>> On Wed, 22 May 1996 11:09:17 -0400,
>> Vinnie Shelton(vs) wrote:
vs> /tmp/zsha19197 /tmp/zshb19197
            ^^             ^^
vs> If one were to diff those (supposedly) two files, they would
vs> apparently be the same, even though they should be different.

Uhm, apparently we both need to see an optometrist :-). Those
filenames are different, of course.

Sorry. Please disregard my previous mail.

-- 
  -mb-

Re: Bogus tempfile names in beta18

[Vinnie Shelton]

In message <199605221606.SAA29528@bolyai.cs.elte.hu>, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote:
>Did you notice that these filenames are different?

Oops.  Sorry about that.  The first time I ran the test, I did it under
beta17, and then when I ran my test script under beta18, I just did
a visual inspection on the filenames.

My apologies,
  vin