From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA00476 for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>; Thu, 23 May 1996 03:13:55 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA22012; Wed, 22 May 1996 12:19:14 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 12:19:14 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov
To: acs@world.std.com
Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: Re: Bogus tempfile names in beta18
References: <9605221509.AA19240@spacely.afive>
From: Mark Borges <mdb@cdc.noaa.gov>
Date: 22 May 1996 10:18:54 -0600
In-Reply-To: Vinnie Shelton's message of Wed, 22 May 1996 11:09:17 -0400
Message-Id: <vkpw7wwuj5.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov>
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.89/XEmacs 19.14
Resent-Message-ID: <"JGOie1.0.pN5.1wpen"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/1118
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

>> On Wed, 22 May 1996 11:09:17 -0400,
>> Vinnie Shelton(vs) wrote:
vs> This bug has been around for awhile.  Someone (Peter?) sent a fix,
Yes, it was Peter. You can always get it back from the archive:

  X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/1061

But it *is* apparently already in b18:

  $ patch < ~/tmp/keep1d/b18p2
  ...
  Patching file Src/exec.c using Plan A...
  Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] n
  Apply anyway? [n]        

though the bug persists:

  $ echo $ZSH_VERSION
  2.6-beta18
  $ print =(cat ~/.zshrc) =(cat ~/.zshenv)
  /tmp/zsha000MD /tmp/zshb000MD

-- 
  -mb-